bug-gnu-utils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question (bug ?) - how to build gawk for Linux on PowerPC ? What are


From: Aharon Robbins
Subject: Re: Question (bug ?) - how to build gawk for Linux on PowerPC ? What are pre-requisites to be prior installed ?
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:52:05 +0200

I think Bob has identified it.  Try to figure out why the native
build isn't working. After all, the linux vendor had to be able
to do it.

I myself don't have a Linux/PPC system, nor access to one, so
I can't help you out otherwise.  Sorry.

Arnold

> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:23:14 -0600
> To: "Povolotsky, Alexander" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "'address@hidden'" <address@hidden>,
>         "'address@hidden'" <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Question (bug ?) - how to build gawk for Linux on PowerPC ? What 
> are pre-requisites to be prior installed ?
>
> Povolotsky, Alexander wrote:
> > See below the capture of failure to buid gawk "natively" (should I
> > crosscompile instead ?)
> > rm: invalid option -- f
> > usage: rm [-d] [-q len] [conf]rm: invalid option -- f
>
> Check for a rogue 'rm' command in your path.
>
>   type rm
>
> Find it and rename it to something that does not collide with the 'rm'
> command.
>
> > sed: invalid option -- n
> > usage: sed [-d] [-q len] [conf]rm: invalid option -- f
>
> Same thing for 'sed'.
>
> Now is it a coincidence that both 'rm' and 'sed' in your listing have
> exactly the same usage message?
>
> Bob




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]