[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gawk number to string bug
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
Subject: |
Re: gawk number to string bug |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:34:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:28:38PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> As you mentioned, your patch works on your platform but relies on undefined
> behavior and so isn't portable.
Just out of curiosity, do you know of any actual platforms in use where my
patch does not work? I have attached it -- it is considerably smaller
than your patch...
> Can you please give this patch a try on your 64-bit platform? It
> works on mine. Please try both 'make check' and David Ellsworth's
> test case. Thanks.
Your patch seems to work fine on both linux/x86 32 bits and 64 bits.
It seems to me like a regression test should be added, regardless of
which patch is used...
Regards,
Andy
gawk.patch
Description: Text document
Re: gawk number to string bug, David Ellsworth, 2005/12/19
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/20
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/21
- Re: gawk number to string bug,
Andrew J. Schorr <=
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/21
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/21
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/21
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/22
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/24