[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gawk number to string bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: gawk number to string bug |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:19:59 +0200 |
> From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBLYWhycw==?=
> <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:35:32 +0100
> Cc:
>
> Here is an old version which is still online:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xcu/awk.html
Thanks. This says that printf should behave as it does in C, with
minor exceptions (which, AFAICS, are not relevant to this thread). It
also says that integral values should be output as if formatted with
%d, so %.0f is not a good idea, I think.
- Re: gawk number to string bug, (continued)
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/23
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Jarc, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/25
- Message not available
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Jürgen Kahrs, 2005/12/24
- Re: gawk number to string bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/25
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/25
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/12/26
- Message not available
- Re: gawk number to string bug, Jürgen Kahrs, 2005/12/22
Re: gawk number to string bug, Aharon Robbins, 2005/12/24