[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sdiff code error
From: |
Paul Edwards |
Subject: |
Re: sdiff code error |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:11:03 +1100 |
>> But writing to memory location 0 is not a good idea!
> It doesn't actually do that.
It doesn't?
> (Wondering what obsolete system that is, which does not have
> sigprocmask. :-) )
I'm porting a lot of stuff to MVS 3.8 (IBM mainframe),
now that I have ported gcc 3.2.3 to it. It is a pure C89
environment. Text processing utilities should be
C89-compliant by default.
BFN. Paul.
- sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error,
Paul Edwards <=
- Re: sdiff code error, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/05
- Re: sdiff code error, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/04
- Re: SPAM: Re: sdiff code error, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/05
- sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/05
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/04
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/05
- Re: sdiff code error, Paul Edwards, 2006/11/05