[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: distribute xz-compressed tarballs, too?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: distribute xz-compressed tarballs, too? |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:59:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Jim Meyering scripsit:
> If it's what you want, just say "I don't want to use xz".
> I can't rebut that ;-)
Gzip compressors and decompressors are already available on, oh,
about 100% of the computers on the planet. Gzip is defined by an
RFC and has dozens of compatible implementations. It's neither
the fastest nor the smallest compression algorithm, but it is
definitely the standard-est.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <address@hidden>
"Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
as any, even sans digital signature." --me
Re: distribute xz-compressed tarballs, too?, Bruno Haible, 2010/06/06