Re: Confusing/unclear documentation of Sed back references

[Bruce Korb]

On 11/26/14 11:40, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 12:29 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The invocation section documents the -r option.
> >
> >    https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html#Invoking-sed
> >
> >    -r
> >    --regexp-extended
> >        Use extended regular expressions rather than basic regular
> >        expressions.  Extended regexps are those that egrep accepts;
> >        they can be clearer because they usually have less backslashes,
> >        but are a GNU extension and hence scripts that use them are not
> >        portable.  See [Extended regular expressions].

Can we fix the grammar too, please?  i.e.  "have *fewer* backslashes"
Thank you :)