[Bug-gnubg] bitfields

bug-gnubg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] bitfields

From:	W.Stroop
Subject:	[Bug-gnubg] bitfields
Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:10:06 +0100

Hi there

I just figured out that single bitfields are using 2 more instructions then
no bitfields. Suppose one has a struct of 8  single bitfields the loss is 16
instructions.
If this is used 10.000 times you lose 160.000 instructions.

Greetings Rob

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/24
- [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/24
  - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/25
- [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields, W.Stroop, 2002/11/25
- [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, W.Stroop <=
  - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Gary Wong, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Gary Wong, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Joern Thyssen, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Jim Segrave, 2002/11/25
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Joseph Heled, 2002/11/25
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields, Øystein Johansen, 2002/11/25

Prev by Date: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Link error build 021125 (changelog 1.794)
Next by Date: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields
Previous by thread: [Bug-gnubg] Bitfields
Next by thread: Re: [Bug-gnubg] bitfields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread