Re: [Bug-gnubg] Windows build 021129 (makefile) - gnbug_ts0.bd question

[Nardy Pillards]

> > > Attached 'my' latest Makefile.
> > >
> > > A question here:
> > > br1.c is generated with the new -f from makebearoff.
> > >
> > > However, for gnubg_ts0.bd, when I did:
> > > " makebearoff -t 6x6 -f gnubg_ts0.bd "
> > > gnubg.exe crashed.
> > > So I started again with:
> > > " makebearoff -t 6x6 > gnubg_ts0.bd "
> > >
> > > (but I am not sure if this is the right way, seems to me -f has to be
used?)
> >
> > Yes - otherwise you'll have the line endings problem.
> > Can you point me to a place where I can get the
> >  makebearoff -t 6x6 -f gnubg_ts0.bd
> >
> > output file so I can compare it to the Unix one I have? I'd expect the
> > crash to happen the other way around (the gnubg_ts0.bd from the
> > redirected output will have the same problem as the built-in one-sided
> > one and will go wandering into strange memory when accessed, as Joern
> > pointed out)
>
> The gnubg_ts0.exe on your web site is definitely not a good idea -
> it's got the extra carriage returns in it and it's 6851238 rather than
> 6830248 bytes long, and that will be the 20990 occurrences of line
> feed in the raw data.
> Jim Segrave           address@hidden

I must have done something wrong.
Made the gnubg_ts0.bd again ( with -f ) and no crashes now.
(new version is published)

Nardy