bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Did I crush the stable tree :-( ?


From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Did I crush the stable tree :-( ?
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:28:06 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote
> From: "Joern Thyssen" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 PM
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:08:14PM +0200, Achim Mueller wrote
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I just put Joern's fix for rollouts (sgf.c) into the stable branch with:
> > >
> > > 1. export CVS_RSH=ssh
> > > 2. export address@hidden:/cvsroot/gnubg
> > > 3. cvs update -kk -j branch-0-13 -j branch-0-13-merged sgf.c
> > > 4. cvs commit -m "Merge changes from branch-0-13-merged." sgf.
> > >
> > > (as Gary showed me months ago), and now compiling stopped with:
> >
> > Gary's instructions were for merging the other way around, i.e., from
> > 0.13 to main trunk.
> >
> > I can't see your commits on cvsweb!?
> 
> I did:
> 
> In E:\gnubg_013: cvs -q -z6 checkout -r branch-0-13 gnubg
> U gnubg/eval.c  Rev 1.215.2.1
> U gnubg/record.c Rev 1.10
> U gnubg/record.h Rev 1.3
> U gnubg/sound.c  Rev 1.16
> U gnubg/po/de.po Rev 1.17.21
> Success, CVS operation completed
> (All Date/Time: 0030409 12:04:56)

This is really strange, if Achim only commited sgf.c?!

I'll look at it later. 

Joern




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]