RE: [Bug-gnubg] weights 0.14

[Albert Silver]

Ok. The reason I asked is because all previous versions were different
in size. Even if by very little.

                                                Albert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:bug-gnubg-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Øystein O Johansen
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:08 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: 'Nardy Pillards'; 'GNUBackgammon bug reporting'; bug-gnubg-
> address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] weights 0.14
> 
> 
> > Just one question: I compared the sizes of 0.13b and 0.14 and they
are
> > exactly the same size. The dates are different, but the number of
bytes
> > is identical. Is that correct?
> 
> Probably, yes! The size of the net is still the same. 250 inputs, 128
> hidden and 5 outputs. There's therefore the same size of weights to be
> store. They're stored with the same size for each weight value, so the
> size
> of the file will therefore be the same.
> 
> -Øystein
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination
of
> the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
> delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg