Re: [Bug-gnubg] Question about Analyze moving

[Mirori]

Thank you for your response.

I analysed over 20 matches of 9 points of mine.
The resaults were all supernatural.
It was impossible for me.

For example, I don't think this is the best move.

GGraccoon (O, 0 pts) vs. SpMirori (X, 0 pts) (Match to 3)

Game number 1

Move number 16: X to play 11

 GNU Backgammon  Position ID: sk2LAxCJOXgAbA
                 Match ID   : QolkAAAAAAAA
 +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+     O: GGraccoon (Cube: 4)
 | X     O  O  O    |   | O  O  O     O  X |     0 points
 | X        O       |   | O  O  O        X |     
 | X                |   |                  |     
 | X                |   |                  |     
 |                  |   |                  |    
v|                  |BAR|                  |     3 point match
 |                  |   |                  |    
 |                  |   |                  |     
 | O           X    |   |                  |     
 | O           X    | X | X                |     Rolled 11
 | O           X    | X | X        X  O  X |     0 points
 +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+     X: SpMirori
Pip counts: O 130, X 190

* SpMirori moves bar/24(2) 8/6

Rolled 11 (+5.500%):
*    1. Cubeful 2-ply    bar/24(2) 8/6                MWC:  21.97%
       0.220 0.025 0.000 - 0.780 0.516 0.136
     2. Cubeful 1-ply    bar/23*/22 bar/24            MWC:  18.85% ( -3.11%)
       0.189 0.028 0.001 - 0.811 0.496 0.104
     3. Cubeful 1-ply    bar/23* bar/24 8/7           MWC:  17.47% ( -4.50%)
       0.175 0.025 0.001 - 0.825 0.532 0.127
     4. Cubeful 1-ply    bar/23* bar/24 6/5           MWC:  12.75% ( -9.22%)
       0.127 0.006 0.000 - 0.873 0.631 0.201
     5. Cubeful 0-ply    bar/24(2) 8/7 3/2*           MWC:  24.79% ( +2.83%)
       0.248 0.033 0.001 - 0.752 0.480 0.119


Output generated Mon Jun 16 19:29:03 2003
by GNU Backgammon 0.13-devel (Text Export version 1.39)


"Nardy Pillards" <address@hidden> wrote:
(2003/06/16 19:14)

>From: "Mirori" <address@hidden>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:43 AM
>
>
>> >> I did "Analyze Match" before asking "Match statistice".
>> >> Cube decision rating and Luck rate look correctly, but only Checker
>play
>> >rating is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Mirori
>> >
>> >Can you send the .sgf file ?
>> >(not to the list, just to me)
>> >
>> >Nardy
>> These are .sgf file and resault of analysis.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Mirori
>
>Chequer play is indeed supernatural. All moves you made were best moves.
>
>Moves unmarked                   26                      25
>Moves marked doubtful             0                       0
>Moves marked bad                  0                       0
>Moves marked very bad             0                       0
>Error rate (total)              +0.000 ( +0.000%)       +0.000 ( +0.000%)
>Error rate (per move)            +0.00 ( +0.000%)        +0.00 ( +0.000%)
>Chequer play rating             Supernatural            Supernatural
>--------------
>
>Cube play however....
>
>Error rate (total)              +0.000 ( +0.000%)       -0.386 ( -9.566%)
>Error rate (per cube decision)   +0.00 ( +0.000%)        -0.19 ( -4.783%)
>Cube decision rating            Supernatural            Awful!
>--------------
>
>And thus the overall statistics show:
>
>Overall statistics:
>
>Error rate (total)              +0.000 ( +0.000%)       -0.386 ( -9.566%)
>Error rate (per decision)        +0.00 ( +0.000%)        -0.02 ( -0.478%)
>Equiv. Snowie error rate         +0.00                  -12.86
>Overall rating                  Supernatural            Casual player
>
>Match winning chance
>against opponent                  59.57%                  40.43%
>Guestimated abs. rating         2200.00                 1764.29
>Estimated FIBS rating           2100.00                  1905.73
>----------------
>
>There is nothing wrong with gnubg's analysis.
>
>Nardy