[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:24:20 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:22:52, David Montgomery wrote:
>> I understand the noise is injected in the outputs of the NN. I always
>> have had the feeling that it would be a better model of human error to
>> inject the noise into the WEIGHTS of the NN. Now that I think about it I
>> think this might also introduce clumping effects, like when the position
>> moves into a region whose processing has been damaged a lot by the
>> partial lobotomy.
>> I guess I could just externally disturb the weights file to create a
>> number of braindamaged bots and experiment with those. Any pointers to
>> where I can find the file format for the wieghts files? Or is this a
>> stupid idea anyways?
>I think this is an interesting idea.
>Here's a third, which might be easier to implement: apply the noise
>directly to the inputs.
I guess that would model blurred vision due to too much alcohol.
Kees
- [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/11
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, David Montgomery, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings,
kvandoel <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some idle musings re. ratings, Nardy Pillads, 2003/09/15