Re: [Bug-gnubg] Current categorization of doubling mistakes (new thread)

[Holger]

At 04:17 07.10.2003, olivier croisille wrote:
> Why on earth did we change categories in the first place anyway? I do 
> favor change, and obviously improvements take time to implement, but here 
> I cannot see *any* value-added over the former categories that were 
> working sooooo fiiiiiiiine, without any mistake in 2 years+ in 
> categorizing doubling mistakes. In the contrary, I just can see confusion 
> for beginners/intermediate players.

Like Joern pointed out it was the limited classification logic and a bug 
report by Massimiliano that made me start working on this. See thread 
"Missed doubles problem ? " starting in August. (e.g.
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-08/msg00632.html and
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-09/msg00112.html )
Btw, at this time nobody opposed to the suggestion, so I implemented it. 
And I don't really see a problem with it. After all that's what this 
mailing list is for, discussing solutions. (If the users would only 
participate in the discussion before it's implemented. I see already the 
forthcoming complaints that this and this can't be done because some data 
is missing when someone implements the database feature. No one responded 
to the survey request for this feature.)

Regards,

        Holger