[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:13:54 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:47PM +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote
> On 16 Oct 2003 at 13:00, Joern Thyssen wrote:
>
> > It works fine for me with an older windows build.
>
> Yeah....
> Must be the same thing causing MET not to be loaded?
No, I don't think so.
.gnubgautorc and .gnubgrc are read from the home directory, which have
not (yet) been changed. Besides, the code is:
sprintf( sz, "%s/.gnubgautorc", szHomeDirectory );
if( ( pf = fopen( sz, "r" ) ) ) {
LoadCommands( pf, sz );
fclose( pf );
}
sprintf( sz, "%s/.gnubgrc", szHomeDirectory );
if( ( pf = fopen( sz, "r" ) ) ) {
LoadCommands( pf, sz );
fclose( pf );
}
I have a hard time imagining that reading .gnubgautorc succeeds and
.gnubgrc fails, since the code is completely analogous.
Jørn
pgpfOIQ5CbucL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question, Holger, 2003/10/17