[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET
From: |
Øystein Johansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:31:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jon Kinsey wrote:
| macherius wrote:
|
|>
|> The suspect patch is this one: "Tue Feb 7 17:56:45 2005 GMT Jon
|> Kinsey <address@hidden> * gnubg.c: change get install dir
|> to look at path to exe (windows)." Around that time MET loading
|> broke in my compiles.
|
|
| I changed the code which looked for the directory gnubg was installed
| in the registry to get this info from the running .exe. This was
| because I now have two different gnubg directories (one for 1.3 and
| one for 2.6) - and it was picking up info from the wrong one.
|
| Perhaps removing the trailing slash is the problem, I'll make this
| change: *p = '\0'; --> p[1] = '\0';
No! That didn't help!
But....
I checked the getInstallDir() returns in the new function compared to
the previous implementation.
The new implementation returns the string of the install directory,
however the earlier (before 7 Feb) implementation returned NULL pointer?
If the function returns NULL, everything else works?
- -Øystein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCE5F06kDTFPhwyqYRAqEZAJ9RmzuB/xKuHAbrTBgTcKuRuxfNjgCfYMgK
oNOACOm3mloIWKuPwcW9Yjc=
=avtM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, macherius, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, Øystein Johansen, 2005/02/15
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, macherius, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, Jon Kinsey, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET,
Øystein Johansen <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, Jon Kinsey, 2005/02/17
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, macherius, 2005/02/17
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, macherius, 2005/02/18
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, macherius, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New gnubg-no-gui.exe unable to read MET, Jon Kinsey, 2005/02/18