Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon 0.16 stable

[Øystein Johansen]

Christian Anthon wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> since the new file choosing interface and the multi-thread code seems
> reasonably stable, I think  we ought to "feature freeze" 0.16 and
> start a new branch.

Yes, indeed! We should also use the features of cvs better and tag and
branch things better as you indicate.

> Anything that needs to be done before we do that?

I can't think of anything except:
> Øystein's batch code could use a bit of a polish I guess.

yes, exactly. What's missing is mainly commented in the code or
discussed at this mailing list. I can't fix these myself these days,
(I'm reading for my exams) so either if someone else can fix it, or just
temporary remove the feature.

-Øystein

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature