[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] Why is it a sanity check for one sided bearoffs?
|
From: |
Øystein Johansen |
|
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] Why is it a sanity check for one sided bearoffs? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2007 16:58:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) |
Hi all!
I'm trying to do some cleanup in the code while I'm reading for my
exams, and then I stumble into a question that I can't find any answer to...
Why does the one-sided bearoff database evaluation can SanityCheck()?
As I understand/read the SanityCheck, it just makes sure the outputs are
between 0.0 and 1.0 and that backgammon don't exceed gammons and gammons
don't exceed wins.
-Øystein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-gnubg] Why is it a sanity check for one sided bearoffs?,
Øystein Johansen <=