bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores


From: Michael Petch
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:02:00 -0600
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

I'm unsure how the architecture is deployed and how OS/X handles the
physical cores, but it almost sounds like one Physical core is being used
(Using Hyperthreads to run 2 threads simultaneously). I wonder if the memory
is shared across all the cores? A friend of mine was suggesting that people
may have to wait for Snow Lapard to come out before OS/X properly utilizes
the Nehalem architecture (whetehr that si true or not, I don't know).

Anyway, as an experiment. If you run 2 copies of Gnubg at the same time
(using multiple threads) do you get 400% CPU usage?






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]