[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-bug_II
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-bug_II |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:05:22 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 |
Was officially removed in April '09 along with Sconyer's bearoff database
support. I agree its much easier to maintain the main variants of Backgammon
and exclude the "local rules". If people wish to use egyptian rule I do
recommend Frank's BgBlitz.
On 08/09/09 1:56 AM, "Øystein Johansen" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>
> I think the "Egyptian Rule" was removed some years ago.
>
> About the original question: I think it's best too keep the software to handle
> only one set of rules. There are many local variants out there, and the number
> of combinations can be enormous.
>
> "Olde English rule"
> "No pick and pass rule"
> "Pass dice option rule"
> "Initial roll selection rule"
> Your local rule here,
>
> -Øystein
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg