bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] Replacement for calibrate function?


From: Jonathan Kinsey
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Replacement for calibrate function?
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:01:49 +0000

I'm planning to remove the calibrate option, largely due to the bad
multithreaded results and general "badness" of this function.

Maybe someone with some Python skills can try and write a script that does a
similar job, on the lines of
1. Set up some standard settings (eval+random number for example)
2. Rollout out or analyse one or more sample positions
3. Report on the speed of the machine
It might be difficult to get the test to run for a reasonable amount of time
(given the range of cpus/number of threads), ideally it would take about 30-60
seconds I would think.

Jon




Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]