|
From: | Timothy Y. Chow |
Subject: | Re: Why such discrepancy for the ranked (obviously wrong) 1st choice between 4 ply and simulation ? |
Date: | Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:22:19 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) |
pierre zakia wrote:
I am aware of what you wrote, but the position doesn't look so tricky to get fooled at 4 ply (compare to roll home a massive backgame for instance), hence my question.
If the decision looks obvious to you, then I suspect that it means that you have a general tendency to undervalue slotting the 6th point of a prime as a containment tactic. 13/9(2) 13/5 is definitely a move that I would consider seriously over the board.
Tim Chow
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |