[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item
From: |
Ron Norman |
Subject: |
Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2023 11:45:24 -0400 |
The group item has a USAGE which is applied to subfields with no USAGE.
Cheers,
Ron Norman
> On May 15, 2023, at 11:42, James K. Lowden <jklowden@schemamania.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2023 08:29:13 -0400
> Ron Norman <rjn@inglenet.com> wrote:
>
>> Microfocus Cobol does accept this and works as if C-W is a POINTER.
>
> Interesting. ISO doesn't allow it.
>
> What is the MF rule? That the USAGE of any name, if missing, can be
> inferred from the one before it, if at the same level?
>
> If so, does that hold for the PICTURE, too?
>
> --jkl
>
- error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Michael Potter, 2023/05/14
- Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, J Leslie Turriff, 2023/05/15
- Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Ron Norman, 2023/05/15
- Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Simon Sobisch, 2023/05/15
- Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Michael Potter, 2023/05/15
- Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Michael Potter, 2023/05/20
- Re: [GnuCOBOL-Dev] error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, Ron Norman, 2023/05/22
Re: error: invalid expression on USAGE POINTER item, James K. Lowden, 2023/05/15