bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnulib] hash.c change to use abort rather than assert


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: [Bug-gnulib] hash.c change to use abort rather than assert
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:06:21 -0800 (PST)

In Bison we recently removed all uses of 'assert' in favor of 'abort'.
Bison uses hash.c so I installed this change into gnulib/lib/hash.c.
If anybody feels that this is a mistake, and that we should use assert
anyway, please let me know and I can revert the change.

2002-11-22  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>

        * hash.c: Avoid use of <assert.h>, as the GNU Coding Standards
        hint that one should use `if (! x) abort ();' rather than `assert
        (x);', and anyway it's one less thing to worry about configuring.
        (hash_lookup, hash_get_first, hash_get_next, hash_find_entry,
        hash_rehash, hash_insert): Use abort rather than assert.

Index: hash.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnulib/gnulib/lib/hash.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -p -u -r1.28 -r1.29
--- hash.c      23 Nov 2001 08:09:14 -0000      1.28
+++ hash.c      23 Nov 2002 07:02:40 -0000      1.29
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* hash - hashing table processing.
-   Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    Written by Jim Meyering, 1992.
 
    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
 typedef enum {false = 0, true = 1} bool;
 #endif
 #include <stdio.h>
-#include <assert.h>
 
 #ifndef HAVE_DECL_FREE
 "this configure-time declaration test was not run"
@@ -263,7 +262,8 @@ hash_lookup (const Hash_table *table, co
     = table->bucket + table->hasher (entry, table->n_buckets);
   struct hash_entry *cursor;
 
-  assert (bucket < table->bucket_limit);
+  if (table->bucket_limit <= bucket)
+    abort ();
 
   if (bucket->data == NULL)
     return NULL;
@@ -292,12 +292,11 @@ hash_get_first (const Hash_table *table)
   if (table->n_entries == 0)
     return NULL;
 
-  for (bucket = table->bucket; bucket < table->bucket_limit; bucket++)
-    if (bucket->data)
+  for (bucket = table->bucket; ; bucket++)
+    if (table->bucket_limit <= bucket)
+      abort ();
+    else if (bucket->data)
       return bucket->data;
-
-  assert (0);
-  return NULL;
 }
 
 /* Return the user data for the entry following ENTRY, where ENTRY has been
@@ -311,7 +310,8 @@ hash_get_next (const Hash_table *table, 
     = table->bucket + table->hasher (entry, table->n_buckets);
   struct hash_entry *cursor;
 
-  assert (bucket < table->bucket_limit);
+  if (table->bucket_limit <= bucket)
+    abort ();
 
   /* Find next entry in the same bucket.  */
   for (cursor = bucket; cursor; cursor = cursor->next)
@@ -754,7 +754,9 @@ hash_find_entry (Hash_table *table, cons
     = table->bucket + table->hasher (entry, table->n_buckets);
   struct hash_entry *cursor;
 
-  assert (bucket < table->bucket_limit);
+  if (table->bucket_limit <= bucket)
+    abort ();
+
   *bucket_head = bucket;
 
   /* Test for empty bucket.  */
@@ -848,7 +850,9 @@ hash_rehash (Hash_table *table, unsigned
            = (new_table->bucket
               + new_table->hasher (data, new_table->n_buckets));
 
-         assert (new_bucket < new_table->bucket_limit);
+         if (new_table->bucket_limit <= new_bucket)
+           abort ();
+
          next = cursor->next;
 
          if (new_bucket->data)
@@ -912,7 +916,9 @@ hash_insert (Hash_table *table, const vo
   void *data;
   struct hash_entry *bucket;
 
-  assert (entry);              /* cannot insert a NULL entry */
+  /* The caller cannot insert a NULL entry.  */
+  if (! entry)
+    abort ();
 
   /* If there's a matching entry already in the table, return that.  */
   if ((data = hash_find_entry (table, entry, &bucket, false)) != NULL)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]