[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:31:34 +0100 (CET) |
Paul Eggert writes:
> If I need a minor change installed because (say) Bison doesn't port to
> Solaris 10 without some minor tweaking, I don't want to have to wait
> for a module maintainer's official approval in order to install the
> obvious tweak.
Sure, that would in 95% of the cases not be a controversial case. I'm
talking about controversial things: major functional changes, all
kinds of renaming, gratuitous stylistic changes, removal of comments,
removal of Woe32 support, major functional changes, changing license
from LGPL to GPL, etc.
> > I would like to ask that Paul doesn't make unnecessary changes
> > (such as "x >= 0" -> "0 <= x", or eliminating casts, or
> > controversial things like that)
>
> That's fine with me.
Thanks for promising this. I can now proceed and contribute some
modules from gettext.
Bruno