bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnulib] proposed new gnu-source module for gnulib


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnulib] proposed new gnu-source module for gnulib
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 19:24:42 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5

Paul Eggert wrote:

>       * modules/euidaccess

Doesn't need m4/gnu-source.m4: the autoconf built-in AC_GNU_SOURCE
is sufficient here, since Solaris doesn't have euidaccess().

> modules/fnmatch

Likewise: Solaris doesn't have FNM_CASEFOLD.

> modules/getline

Likewise: Solaris doesn't have getline(), getdelim().

>       modules/group-member

Likewise: Solaris doesn't have group_member().

> modules/mempcpy modules/regex

Likewise: Solaris doesn't have mempcpy().

> modules/memrchr,

Likewise.

>       modules/stpcpy

Likewise.

> modules/stpncpy

Likewise.

> modules/strchrnul,

Likewise.

>       modules/strndup

Likewise.

> modules/strverscmp

Likewise.

> modules/strnlen

__EXTENSIONS__ won't help because <string.h> doesn't include <apptrace.h>.

So in summary, for modules/timespec and modules/unlocked-io I have no
objections, but for the others it's overkill to make these modules depend
on the m4/gnu-source.m4 file when the autoconf built-in already does all
that's needed.

Bruno





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]