[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:04:49 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:
>
> Right.
> I did a survey, some time ago, of reasonable porting targets, and all
> had fchdir. Eventually I should remove the test for fchdir, too.
FYI, mingw is another relatively-active porting target that lacks fchdir, which
would benefit from a good fchdir replacement. As to whether you consider mingw
a reasonable porting target, that's a different question (native Windows tends
to be quite far from POSIX to make it a very difficult porting task).
--
Eric Blake
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, (continued)
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Eric Blake, 2006/11/29
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/29
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Eric Blake, 2006/11/29
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/30
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Eric Blake, 2006/11/30
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/30
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/30
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/30
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/30
- Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Ben Pfaff, 2006/11/30
Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir,
Eric Blake <=
Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Nix, 2006/11/29