Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules

[Simon Josefsson]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> The week is over. I'm marking the modules that you specified as LGPLv2+.
> Except the tests, because they can be under GPL without problems, since they
> are not installed into libraries.

Thanks!

> Note that the following modules are not yet marked as LGPLv2+. I don't know
> if you intended it like this.
>   crypto/arcfour:LGPL
>   crypto/arctwo:LGPL
>   crypto/hmac-md5:LGPL
>   crypto/hmac-sha1:LGPL
>   crypto/md5:LGPL
>   crypto/rijndael:LGPL
>   crypto/sha1:LGPL

What does 'LGPL' mean?  v2.1+ or v3.0?  The above are/may be needed by
GnuTLS, so I think it would be useful if the remain LGPLv2.1+.

/Simon