[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no license on some test modules
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: no license on some test modules |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:17:32 +0100 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> And indeed, there can be circular dependencies. I tested the same m4 setup on
> mingw. If libtests.a is listed first, progname.o is not included. But if it
> is listed second only, then gl_array_list.o generates a missing link to
> xmalloc
> and friends. The only solution is repeating the LDADD. I'm committing the
> following:
>
> From: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:54:54 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Avoid link failures with separate libtests.a.
>
> * gnulib-tool (func_emit_tests_Makefile_am): Also list local_ldadd
> last, to satisfy circular dependencies.
Good catch.
Thanks for dealing with it.
- no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/05
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/07
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/26
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/26