[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sockets
From: |
Brian Dessent |
Subject: |
Re: sockets |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:22:10 -0800 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thanks for testing. I think the test "just happens" to fail under
> cygwin, but as long as that is always consistent, I think that is fine.
In a sense, HAVE_WINSOCK2_H=0 is in fact correct on Cygwin. Even though
the header is available it's not correct to include it in a Cygwin
program.
Brian
- sockets, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/18