[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:12:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hi Gary,
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> ... upgrade my gnulib checkout and rebuild m4 HEAD against it.
> ... there are /\(still\|new\)/ frexpl bugs in gnulib on my intel MacBook:
>
> $ VERBOSE=1 make check TESTS='test-frexpl test-printf-frexpl'
> [[...]]
> make check-TESTS
> i:-16382 exp:-16384
> .../../../tests/gnu/test-frexpl.c:136: assertion failed
> FAIL: test-frexpl
This ought to have been fixed by the patch presented in [1], last week.
(The MacOS X 10.5/i386 frexpl() function turned out to be buggy for
denormalized numbers; the patch adds a configure time test for it.)
Can you run the test program mentioned in [2]? And/or look at the
configure messages relating to frexpl?
Last not least, are you compiling in 32-bit mode (i686) or in 64-bit mode
(x86_64)? As we now know, the config.guess result does not contain this
information.
Bruno
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-01/msg00193.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-01/msg00176.html
- frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/24
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/24
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/01/24
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/24
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/25
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/25
- Re: frexpl bugs remain on OS X 10.5 intel, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/26