[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memchr speed
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: memchr speed |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:45:45 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Simon Josefsson <simon <at> josefsson.org> writes:
>
> Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:
>
> > I think it would be even simpler to just avoid intprops.h (after all,
> > memchr.c was originally borrowed from glibc, which doesn't have
> > intprops.h).
>
> I like that.
OK, I've done it for memchr, memrchr, strchrnul, and memchr2 (although the
latter is not in glibc, so that was only for consistency with the other three).
--
Eric blake
- Re: memchr2 speed, gcc, (continued)
Re: memchr2 speed, gcc, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/26
Re: strchrnul speed, Eric Blake, 2008/04/28
Re: strchrnul speed, Eric Blake, 2008/04/28