[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interix
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Interix |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:16:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
[Dropping the Austin Group from the CCs, since Interix does not attempt
POSIX compliance.]
Jason Zions <Jason.Zions at microsoft.com> wrote:
> A few hundred thousand users of applications ported to that environment
> might disagree. Interix and the Vista/WS08 Subsystem for UNIX Applications
> do not include an sa_sigaction member, as you point out, but they don't
> claim to conform to the C Extensions or to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001.
The target audience of gnulib are primarily the developers, not the end users.
The effort that I put into the gnulib support of a particular system does not
depend on the number of end users, but on the number of developers who are
willing to contribute (through bug reports, testing, etc.).
As far as I remember, only 1 person has shown interest in Interix portability
on this mailing list in 5 years. Why the interest in Interix is so low, I can
only speculate. I guess it's because Interix compiled program cannot use the
Win32 API, whereas mingw compiled programs and Cygwin compiled programs can.
If you (or a colleague of yours at microsoft.com) are interested in increasing
the gnulib support for Interix, a good step is to test gnulib's current state:
1. Create a test directory
./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --with-tests --directory=/tmp/testdir
on a POSIX compliant system (such as Cygwin or Linux).
2. Transfer the created directory to the target machine.
3. There, run
./configure
make
make check
4. Report all problems.
Bruno
- RFC: sigaction module, Eric Blake, 2008/06/16
- Re: RFC: sigaction module, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/16
- Re: RFC: sigaction module, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/17
- Re: RFC: sigaction module, Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/17
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/18
- RE: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Jason Zions, 2008/06/18
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/19
- Re: Interix,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/19
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/19
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/21
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22