[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test-poll vs ioctl
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: test-poll vs ioctl |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:51:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) |
> There is no -I for the $gltests/ directory in $gl/, so this fails.
>
> I think the ioctl replacement function should be moved out from
> winsock.c to a new ioctl.c.
>
> What do you think of the patch below?
Before applying something like this, it would make sense to understand
if the root problem could happen in other cases.
Paolo
- new module 'ioctl', Bruno Haible, 2008/10/09
- Re: new module 'ioctl', Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/10
- test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25