[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MINT
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: MINT |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:45:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> The only commitment I'm asking from gnulib is to apply patches that we
> submit. They'll be #ifdef __MINT__ anyway, isn't that acceptable ??
A patch with #ifdef __MINT__ certainly helps us understand the issue. But
we need a plain-text description of the issue as well. Just applying
patches with #ifdef is not gnulib's way of doing: When we apply a patch,
we try to make it useful to as many platforms as possible. Often a problem
exists in several platforms; we prefer a single autoconf test to a couple
of #ifdefs.
Bruno
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Albert Chin, 2008/12/09
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/21
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/12/22