[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: working with "good enough" functions
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: working with "good enough" functions |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:01:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 1/8/2009 2:49 AM:
> If this happens often enough, perhaps gnulib should have a
> printf-posix-no-fp module that does what you want?
The newlib library, and thus cygwin, go so far as to provide the *iprintf
family of functions in parallel with the *printf functions (for example,
siprintf is like sprintf except that it does not understand %[eEfFgGaA]).
It is certainly a lighter-weight function, as skipping out on
float-to-decimal conversion code removes a large chunk of printf's bulk.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkll+T8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBiaACglWGc7PJZFIX0dI0mttH4qgDi
u0kAoJL6ObfNIw1xxQN6Z1n9FmQ/dChy
=S77p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paul Eggert, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/18