[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:16:17 +0200 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I'll make it say "guessing yes" and still put "yes" in the variable.
>
> Thanks. Here is what the adaptation in gnulib could look like. But frankly,
> I'll prefer to remove the module altogether: The bug it cures occurred only
> on Sequents; the last time I heard about this kind of machine was in 1996.
>
> So, any objections to removing this module?
Why don't we first mark it as obsolete?
I'll stop using it in coreutils right away, and we can
remove it altogether after a reasonable grace period.
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, (continued)
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Andreas Schwab, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Bruno Haible, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paul Eggert, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Eric Blake, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Jim Meyering, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Bruno Haible, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/10
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Bruno Haible, 2009/04/10