[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setproctitle()
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: setproctitle() |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 09:37:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 05/04/2010 09:21 AM, Peter Seebach wrote:
> In message <address@hidden>, Jim Meyering writes:
>> Can you simply declare the copyright to be LGPLv2+?
>> Many modules are already LGPLv2+ (see modules/*).
>
> I could if I were just releasing the code myself, but if the FSF needs
> a copyright assignment, does that not imply that I no longer get to
> choose the copyright?
As original author, you get to choose the license that will be used
within gnulib. I see nothing wrong with you declaring that the
setproctitle module is LGPLv2+.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/03
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(),
Eric Blake <=
- Re: setproctitle(), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Eric Blake, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04