|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: RFC: modules for generic unordered sets and mappings |
Date: | Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:50:30 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
On 07/02/2010 04:01 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Paolo,Maintenance and, secondarily, RAM cost.RAM cost? Do you think linking with a shared library with 100 modules costs less RAM than having 5 of these modules linked in the executable? Also, do you frequently run 'm4' at the same time as you view PDF files or run 'msgfmt'? I think, in the current situation, linking with a non-shared library is still perfectly fine.
I may even agree with you, but it's still a common objection that "gnulib does things differently, why should it?".
(BTW, I wasn't aware of the licensing of libnih). Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |