[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2012 09:22:41 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 05/22/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I wonder if the 'extensions' module should add a -U_POSIX_SOURCE to
> CFLAGS on platforms where defining _POSIX_SOURCE is known to disable
> useful extensions.
Typically it's not a good idea to second-guess users if they explicitly
put something into CFLAGS. The need here does not seem to be great,
so it's probably better to leave things alone.
- Re: [PATCH] strdup: undeprecate, IRIX 6.5 needs it, (continued)
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/21
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Simon Josefsson, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Simon Josefsson, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Simon Josefsson, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Simon Josefsson, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2012/05/22
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?, Simon Josefsson, 2012/05/22