[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
musl compatibility
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
musl compatibility |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:14:45 +0100 |
Someone just wrote a rant in a bug report for a program I maintain
about gnulib being the cause of many portability problems. I tracked
it down to the points raised here:
http://www.etalabs.net/musl/faq.html
Have you any plans to address these problems? In particular, it does
seem odd to place a burden on libc authors of porting gnulib to it,
rather than just not supporting those functions which require
non-standard APIs on such libc's.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- musl compatibility,
Reuben Thomas <=
- Re: musl compatibility, Pedro Alves, 2012/06/08
- Re: musl compatibility, Reuben Thomas, 2012/06/08
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/23
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23