[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: musl printf bugs
From: |
Rich Felker |
Subject: |
Re: musl printf bugs |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:58:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > considering printf broken, and replacing printf
> > because of this, is a big issue. Replacing printf is non-trivial
>
> There is also another test that causes musl's printf to be overridden:
>
> checking whether printf supports the 'ls' directive... no
Yep, I caught this one a while back. It's fixed in git. %ls was
over-reading (not over-printing, just over-reading) by one wchar_t
when precision was specified, and if that extra wchar_t happened to be
invalid, it would bail with EILSEQ.
Rich
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, (continued)
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, John Spencer, 2012/06/19
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Eric Blake, 2012/06/19
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/19
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/19
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl printf bugs,
Rich Felker <=
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/23
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/26
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17