[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rationale for closein
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: rationale for closein |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:33:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 06/18/2012 08:30 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> after a
> successful flush, I consider it the operating system's data loss, not
> the application's, if the data fails to end up on permanent storage.
Many operating systems behave that way, alas. This is for
performance reasons. NFS is a classic example, but there
are others.
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- rationale for closein, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/18
- Re: rationale for closein, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: rationale for closein, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/18
- Re: rationale for closein, Eric Blake, 2012/06/18
- Re: rationale for closein, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: rationale for closein, Eric Blake, 2012/06/19
- Re: rationale for closein, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- dlsym [was: rationale for closein], Eric Blake, 2012/06/19
- Re: rationale for closein,
Paul Eggert <=