[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:44:16 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 |
Karl Berry wrote:
> The difference lies in *non*-glibc functionality offered by gnulib.
Sure, but Gnulib isn't limited to glibc functionallity;
it also does functionality standardized (or probably-will-be-
standardized) by POSIX but not yet in glibc, functionality
needed to support other LGPLed libraries
that are part of the GNU project, minor extensions to
glibc functionality for platforms that glibc does not
support, functionality widely available in other (non-GNU)
library implementations, and so forth.
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, (continued)
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Eric Blake, 2013/09/12
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Simon Josefsson, 2013/09/12
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/12
- Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/09/23
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/23