Re: Small improvement to relocatable-maint.texi

[Ben Pfaff]

Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:

> s/RedHat, Debian, and similar package systems/Yum, apt and similar
> package-management systems/

I agree that this was not well worded.

I applied the following commit to master.

--8<--------------------------cut here-------------------------->8--

From: Ben Pfaff <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:17:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Improve wording in relocatable-maint.texi.

Reported by Reuben Thomas <address@hidden>.
---
 ChangeLog                  |    6 ++++++
 doc/relocatable-maint.texi |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index aae8c64..aa5c36f 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-11-18  Ben Pfaff  <address@hidden>
+
+       * doc/relocatable-maint.texi (Supporting Relocation): Improve
+       wording.
+       Reported by Reuben Thomas <address@hidden>.
+
 2013-11-13  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>
 
        * lib/getgroups.c (posix_getgroups, getgroups) [__APPLE__]:
diff --git a/doc/relocatable-maint.texi b/doc/relocatable-maint.texi
index 58160cf..8780b84 100644
--- a/doc/relocatable-maint.texi
+++ b/doc/relocatable-maint.texi
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ and have it work correctly (including i18n).  So many users 
need to go
 through @code{configure; make; make install} with all its
 dependencies, options, and hurdles.
 
-Red Hat, Debian, and similar package systems solve the ``ease of
+Red Hat, Debian, and other binary distributions solve the ``ease of
 installation'' problem, but they hardwire path names, usually to
 @file{/usr} or @file{/usr/local}.  This means that users need root
 privileges to install a binary package, and prevents installing two
-- 
1.7.10.4