[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:01:56 -0700 |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> the first variant compiled
>> just fine here (and probably everywhere),
>> so HAVE_GETGROUPLIST_WITH_INT was not defined.
>
>
> Yes, well, it did work on GNU/Linux, which is what I tested it on.....
>
> How about if we make the check pickier, so that it is likely to be triggered
> even without --enable-gcc-warnings, as in the attached?
Thanks for another patch! Unfortunately, that still evokes only a
warning at least
with gcc 6.0.0 20150426.
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Paul Eggert, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Jim Meyering, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Paul Eggert, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Jim Meyering, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Paul Eggert, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Jim Meyering, 2015/06/29
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Paul Eggert, 2015/06/30
- Re: bug#20923: mgetgroups.c vs getgrouplist warning on OS X, Jim Meyering, 2015/06/30