[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in nanosleep() implementation for Unix platforms lacking same
From: |
Daniel Richard G. |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in nanosleep() implementation for Unix platforms lacking same |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:25:19 -0400 |
On Fri, 2015 Sep 18 09:32+0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> I think the SIGCONT handling is to handle reception of explicit
> SIGSTOP and SIGCONT
Ah, okay, that makes sense.
> > and even if it did, the nanosleep() implementation would then return
> > 1 instead of the correct value of -1.
>
> Yes that looks incorrect.
> Perhaps something like this suffices:
Indeed, test-nanosleep now passes for me on both Linux (when using that
implementation) and the system I'm working on. Thank you for the fix!
--Daniel
--
Daniel Richard G. || address@hidden
My ASCII-art .sig got a bad case of Times New Roman.