[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib]
From: |
arnold |
Subject: |
Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib] |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2018 11:59:23 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
> > Can you elaborate? Is it mainly in the LIBC part of the code that it's
> > not implemented correctly?
>
> Sorry, I haven't followed that part of the code closely. There are some
> FIXMEs
> there, as I recall. I'd be surprised if RRI were fully implemented even in
> the
> !_LIBC part of the code.
I find this statement surprising and discouraging. I would like to see
a test case to prove/disprove it one way or the other, particularly
for multibyte locales. As the original RRI code came from gawk, I
am pretty sure that the ! _LIBC part of the code does get it right.
Or at least did in my version.
Thanks,
Arnold
- Re: [gawk-devel] changing regex lib, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/10
- Re: [gawk-devel] changing regex lib, Bruno Haible, 2018/08/10
- Re: [gawk-devel] changing regex lib, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/12
- Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib], arnold, 2018/08/12
- Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib], Paul Eggert, 2018/08/12
- Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib],
arnold <=
- Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib], arnold, 2018/08/12
- Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib], Paul Eggert, 2018/08/12
- Re: Rational Ranges [was Re: gnulib regex lib], arnold, 2018/08/13
Re: [gawk-devel] changing regex lib, arnold, 2018/08/12