[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
dfa MT-safe?
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
dfa MT-safe? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:43:20 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-166-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Paul, Arnold, Jim,
If the 'dfa' module supposed to be multithread-safe?
I'm asking because dfa.c invokes
setlocale (LC_ALL, NULL),
and I've found out that this call is not MT-safe on musl libc, macOS,
FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, AIX, Haiku, Cygwin, MSVC.
I'm working on a fix and would like to know whether to include 'dfa'
among the modules to be fixed...
Bruno
- dfa MT-safe?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Paul Eggert, 2019/12/14
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Bruno Haible, 2019/12/14
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, arnold, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Bruno Haible, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, arnold, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Norihiro Tanaka, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Paul Eggert, 2019/12/16
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, arnold, 2019/12/16