Re: [PATCH] tests: dissuade unwanted clang optimization

[Paul Eggert]

On 2024-11-22 07:50, Bruno Haible wrote:
> The tests now give the impression that direct
> use of memcpy etc. with NULL and 0 arguments is unreliable. Which — as we
> know so far — isn't.

I suppose we test both with volatile function pointers, to test the 
actual Gnulib code, and without the pointers, to test possible compiler 
misoptimizations. Though that would generate more of the false-positive 
warnings that motivated the change....