Re: [PATCH] crc: Add PCLMUL implementation

[Bruno Haible]

Sam Russell wrote:
> It makes sense to keep them in the same module though, I agree.

Thanks.

> I'd prefer to keep them as separate files if you're okay with it. I did a
> quick experiment and by wrapping each function in push_options and
> pop_options pragmas it was pretty easy to get it all working in the same
> file so I can confirm that option does work.

It's your choice: 3 compilation units for x86_64, or 1 compilation unit
for x86_64, or no extra compilation unit (all code contained in .h files) —
as you prefer. Fine with me either way.

Bruno